Over 59607

Myth Politics

White Privilege is a Myth -

TAGS: white privilege is a myth
Rating: 2.21/5

More politifakes by MMessEnnBeeCee

MMessEnnBeeCee - May 25, 2015, 3:51 pm
That's the best you can do? 46 votes and it's only at 1.95? Wimps!

Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -

TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward

MYTHS - Which one is less believable?

Debunking myths I -

JOHN MOHAMMAD - Zero terrorist attacks on American soil since 9/11?

MYTHOLOGY - A Traditional or legendary Story, like the one where government eliminates poverty!

TAGS: mythology
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

GrouchoMarxist - September 27, 2012, 12:34 am
Even the nymphs get a living wage and all their birth control covered

if man-made global warming was to bring major hurricanes -

TAGS: 2014 hurricanes global warming myth
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 9:53 pm

Yet I somehow make it worse......
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 9:51 pm

Don't I look silly now that the trou Don't I look silly now that the troublemakers comments have been deleted.....I should learn to take my own advice.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 5:15 pm

So, you're done now?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 5:07 pm

Calm down Emma. Try the strawberry rhubarb.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 4:08 pm

I like blueberry pie the best, but I wouldn't say no to lemon meringue.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 22, 2014, 11:20 pm

So........ No?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 22, 2014, 9:37 pm

I take it you don't plan to be mature about this?
OTC - November 5, 2014, 7:52 pm
We're still waiting to see Al Gore's scientific credentials
crankyhead - November 3, 2014, 5:24 pm
Mooo, not to b*** in, but, I for one can't wait to see how he twists this to try to blame his own behaviour on you or me or someone else.
crankyhead - November 3, 2014, 5:22 pm
… to refute the 'facts' as he's presented them, there actually have to be some 'facts' presented. Y'know, logic?
crankyhead - November 3, 2014, 5:21 pm
Oh, he's a meteorologist is he? Perhaps you'd like to kindly tell us which institution gave him his degree? Also, still waiting for you to point out the SCIENTIFIC research he supposedly did, to support his UNSUBSTANTIATED opinion. Ergo; in order...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 31, 2014, 8:56 pm

It was only a week long ban. You could have just toughed it out and come back. I'm glad we get to see this side of you though, it's a far cry from all of those pm's you've sent me trying to be my pal and kissing my a**.
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:11 pm
…it is that you live in?
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:11 pm
…think, is he? Hardly. Maybe it's also your a**ertion that every tofu eating, rainbow flag waving, tree hugging long hair in California can accurately represent the interests and ideology of whatever mid west, gun toting, sister kissing trailer park...
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:09 pm
www.thecanadaguide.com? That's the infallible evidence you're using to support your fallacy of composition, is it? Some 30 year old Vancouverite who has self admittedly never left the province is able to tell you what the fine folks of Newfoundland….
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:07 pm
…research, I'm sure everyone in the world will be happy to look over his proofs.
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:07 pm
Hate to break it to ya, but John Coleman is a journalist, not a scientist. Let alone a 'top scientist', or even a "worlds top meteorological scientist', whatever it is you think that is. If you'd like to disagree, please just point out some of his….
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 30, 2014, 11:58 pm

Still Prime Minister champ. What else you got? What title did she hold before she became Prime Minister? Are you going to tell us she was the maid? pure ignorance.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 30, 2014, 10:27 pm

Kim Campbell was Canada's first Female prime Minister. 20 years ago......You are ignorant. We have many female and aboriginal leaders. Get your facts straight....again.
OTC - October 30, 2014, 7:23 pm
So you're saying that GOP obstructionism is based on racism?
OTC - October 30, 2014, 7:27 am
I was pointing out the stupid BS made by researchers who made the claim, like Al Gore's stupid BS about the ice caps melting by 2014
OTC - October 30, 2014, 7:19 am
Why bother? Because i think it's funny how there are plenty of stories how man made global warming is responsible for super hurricanes and they will be the new norm, and TA's attack on me seems to suggest i made those claims, so how can i take him serious
OTC - October 28, 2014, 11:23 am
And that, TA, is what the poster is referring to (roll eyes)
OTC - September 17, 2014, 9:45 pm
"the dogs of doom are howling more"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:17 pm
well, otc, looks like it's your turn to be attacked by the big bad scientist. Careful, his attack dogs are usually right behind him and I think they have rabies.
OTC - September 16, 2014, 12:06 pm
You're confused, you've been talking about Global Warming which i don't deny, I'm making fun of 'Man-Made' Global Warming, which i do deny. Totally different subjects.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 5:53 pm
"sarcastic" eh? so you're saying you arent a climate change denialist? because i dont see a single godd*** shred of sarcasm, i think you made it seriously, and now you're backpedalling because you realise how incredibly dumb it is.
OTC - September 11, 2014, 2:12 pm
wow, all this for you to justify this sarcastic poster about M-MGW and more severe hurricanes.
terroraustralis - September 10, 2014, 5:10 pm
and it pisses me off when people claim these hurricanes are proof of global warming, because they're just clouding the debate with even more unscientific bull****. being right for the wrong reasons is just as bad as being wrong.
terroraustralis - September 10, 2014, 4:59 pm
exactly. the confusion comes from the prediction that global warming will increase the intensity of hurricanes and allow them to appear further north, hurricane(s) katrina and sandy are antecdotal evidence of this, they dont prove or disprove anything.
EmmaRoydes - September 9, 2014, 2:39 pm
right on the money curly
Curlyrocks - September 9, 2014, 1:11 pm
A better a***ogy: a lack of any big hurricane in a year disproves GW is like saying a big hurricane would prove global warming. Hurricanes happen in the caribbean, it's the climate down there.
terroraustralis - September 9, 2014, 3:47 am
saying that the lack of a big hurricane in one year disproves global warming is like saying that the rise in government jobs proves that obama is fixing the economy.
terroraustralis - September 9, 2014, 3:45 am
the lack of big hurricanes in any one year does not prove global warming doesnt exist. my comment was intentionally wrong and stupid, to give you an idea of how wrong and stupid your poster looks to us. seriously, look at the comment directly below this.
OTC - September 8, 2014, 3:34 pm
Get your facts straight, Obama is NOT getting rid of ALL the jobs, just the private sector ones. I have a government job.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 11:56 pm
Emma, who is your "doodoo heads" reply directed at?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 9:46 pm
after all, you are an admitted flaming liberal
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 9:45 pm
speaking of doo doo heads, what do you do for a living besides welch off of other people's hard work and income?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 9:44 pm
You mean like the MTU definition: Computer science is a discipline that spans theory and practice. I don't deal in computer theory, I deal exclusively in hands on networking and programming.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 9:13 pm
You could always look up the definition of 'computer scientist' if you've got some issue with what I said. Before you do that though, you should alert your neighbors that you'll be flying into fit of rage, and that they shouldn't worry.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 9:10 pm
Considering that we were discussing your pot/kettle attitude, I think it's obvious that my 5 minutes of research did in fact, produce something useful, on-topic and sensible. No surprise to anyone that you disagree. #boohoomoments
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 2, 2014, 3:56 pm

You guys are boring. Why don't you talk about politics instead of arguing over who's the bigger doo doo head?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 3:43 pm
Sure, cranky, just like someone who has a baccalaureate in art is an artist, right?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 3:20 pm
might even come up with something useful, on-topic, or sensible for a change. Pretty doubtful that you could pull that off though.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 3:19 pm
I reply in kind to people like you who attack me. You just like to attack without provocation. Hence the stupidity you are exhibiting in this conversation. You should try to focus a little, take a moment, and think before you respond to comments. You
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:57 pm
Emma, people with degrees in computer science, are called 'computer scientists'. Just so's ya know, child.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:56 pm
Yeah, we all see what you do, and as we've just established, ever since your "very first comment" on this site, you attack other members, and call them names and then cry like a stuck pig whenever someone dares to hold you to your own standards.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 1:40 pm
Nope, I said that I have a baccalaureate in computer science. I never claimed to be be a scientist of any kind. Do I need to explain the difference to you?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 1:37 pm
All righty then. My comment where I referred to you as skippy happened in September, and you used it in your argument about when I first got here. Now do you see what I did there?
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:08 pm
Speaking of hallucinations, didn't you claim to be a computer scientist, around two week ago Emma?
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:01 pm
Apparently, I understand calendars better than you do, Emma.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:29 am
rein in that ego. Life can suck when you think the internet is all about you or everyone is stupid compared to you, Einstein (or is that Epstein?)
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:28 am
waaaaah! my reputation with you is permanently ruined. How will I ever live with myself. I've never claimed to be a scientist, but if that's your most recent hallucination, go with it, it suits you just fine. In the meantime, stop trolling me and try to
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:27 am
avoid politics. It's not for the feint of heart.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:26 am
when did you hallucinations begin to think that I have an anti-science avatar? Why would I change it to annoy you? Your ego gets in the way of being a contributing member of this site by taking everything here as if it was directed at you. Toughen up or
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:25 am
just go to hell.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:24 am
I'm glad it annoys you even if it isn't true. I post . whenever the desire to post a comment strikes me. You want me to stop, become a mod, then you can be the egotistical a**hole that you play so well and you can decide who you want to post. Otherwise,
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:21 am
I didn't say I knew you were being sarcastic, I said you were being an a**hole. I've never pretended that I was you friend. It's not something I desire nor am I foolish enough to think the internet is my real life.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:20 am
I didn't notice that you were a mod now. If memory serves me correctly, they are the only ones that can tell me whether or where I can post. Besides, THIS ISN'T EVEN YOUR POSTER, so WHY POST COMMENTS AT ALL?
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:52 am
And there is a reason I chose the words CONFIRMATION BIAS with you. you, i, and pretty much everyone else here knows that reason. So you can stop pretending to be stupid about that as well.
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:46 am
your reputation is permanently ruined with me. The only thing more laughable than you being a scientist is watching you pretend to be civil or my friend. I dont respect you, i despise you. Why? You're insincere AND proud of your confirmation bias
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:45 am
you even changed your avatar into an anti-science nutter one because you thought it would annoy me. troll much? so stop playing stupid. no one with integrity here is buying it. that's why only YOU believe in your own BS. i don't speak troll, only you do
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:45 am
and before you say "hurr durr,Im not a troll",you confessed to trolling when you said "But I now know that my posting caused your panties to get in a bunch, so I'll refrain from responding to any further responses you make" like all trolls,you're bragging
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:44 am
so now you're just following me around, harassing me in the way that has worked for you in the past. ill admit, it IS really, really, REALLY annoying, but you're not gonna provoke me into an outburst that will get me banned. your plan wont work.
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:44 am
You said you knew I was being sarcastic. Just like the way you know you were being phony by pretending to be civil and by pretending you were ever my friend. You are neither. Now you know this too. So commit it to memory OR at least admit you're trolling
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:43 am
then WHY REPLY AT ALL??? THIS ISNT EVEN YOUR POSTER. i wasn't talking to you. you know i dont care for your anti-science nutter views. so the only reason for you to say ANYTHING is because (a) you want to troll me or (b) you're pretending to be my friend
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 12:17 am
I take you don't know what month it is. It's ok, cranky, nobody expects you to understand calendars.
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 9:31 pm
September? What? #usemilkonyourcheeriosinsteadofwhiskey
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 7:57 pm
To me, your postings sound like sour gra**s. Did you get banned from the site? Did it make you cry? Do you miss the site? Do you miss me?
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 7:54 pm
Not that it's of any concern of yours, but I chose the name because I found it amusing. If you don't find it amusing, to quote your God, "sue me"
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 7:40 pm
I guess you have no sense of time, right? Which comes first, now think hard, April or September? tick tock
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 6:04 pm
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 5:35 pm
I guess 'Skippy' is a term of endearment now? =) #hooklineandsinker
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 5:34 pm
Pretty abrasive isn't it?
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 5:34 pm
The earliest post of mine that I could find was on April 19 where I said "Holy Crap! A Squirrel" http://www.politifake.org/globalcomments.php?p=65388
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 5:16 pm
Tell me, skippy, what was my very first post on this site?
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 5:05 pm
Not willing to be held to her own standard, Emma posts this absolute gem of a retort, completely forgetting all about the tone and direction of her own "very first posting" on this website. #pot/kettle
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 2:00 pm
and as far as Julie goes, her very first posting on this site was attacking me. So your love for her and sorrow at seeing her go is totally lost on me anyway. Sounds like a "boo hoo" moment to me.
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 1:45 pm
But I now know that my posting caused your panties to get all bunched up, so I will refrain from responding to any further smart a** comments that you make. Bueno?
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 1:44 pm
I wasn't trying to initiate a discussion with you, nor do I wish to have you respect my views. I merely put it out there in response to a smart a** statement that you posted, nothing more, nothing less.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:41 pm
i didnt realise it at the time, but julie really took a bullet for me. the way you baited her let me see just how insidious and manipulative you really are. you're probably the most skilled troll i've ever had the misfortune of coming in contact with.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:36 pm
its like you're meticulously researched exactly what pisses me off the most, and figured out how to apply it perfectly... i should applaud you, its not often that trollbait fails by being too good...
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:34 pm
to put it more bluntly, i've never seen an argument so perfectly designed to make me explode. you wont trick me into swearing or insulting you, but you're doing too good of a job at rubbing me the wrong way, to not be trolling.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:24 pm
how am i supposed to believe that you want a serious discussion when you keep acting like this whole thing is a big joke? i've seen you form coherent arguments before, and yet you refuse to use a coherent argument with me.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:14 pm
you civil and try to initiate a discussion, and then you bring this to the table? thats like showing up to a barbecue with a tofu turkey and alcohol-free beer. how am i supposed to respect your views when you cite articles that oppose your argument?
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 11:58 am
what has me even more confused is the fact that you're citing an article that is in favour of the idea of manmade climate change. you dont believe a word these people say, and yet you're telling me to trust them?
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 11:49 am
it even states "It is premature to conclude that human activities--and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming--have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane activity.", you're doing a good job of refuting the poster.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 11:44 am
strange, it doesnt say anywhere that not having a hurricane in any one year means that global warming isnt real... it just says that global warming will increase the frequency of strong hurricanes.
EmmaRoydes - August 31, 2014, 8:58 am
Sorry, that should have been *according to NOAA...
EmmaRoydes - August 31, 2014, 8:56 am
According to NASA: http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes
terroraustralis - August 31, 2014, 4:28 am
what do hurricanes have to do with global warming?
EmmaRoydes - August 30, 2014, 9:59 am
What does this poster have to do with the number of jobs?
terroraustralis - August 30, 2014, 1:11 am
to clarify, i dont like obama, and i dont like stupid bull****, and the notion that anyone has ever said "global warming means big hurricanes every year" is some REALLY stupid bull****.
terroraustralis - August 30, 2014, 1:09 am
if obama is getting rid of all the jobs, howcome you still have one?

Debunking Myths II -

busted -


CLIMATE CHANGE - An unproven theory created by scientists who have manipulated data to have $$$ rolling into their projects.

IMMUTABLE TRUTH - Reagan gave 100% immunity to illegal immigrants.

OBAMA'S "MADRASA" - Those extremists look so scary!

OXYMORONS - They're everywhere

LONDON 2012 UNVEILS "GOLDEN CHEESEGRATER" OLYMPIC TORCH". - A promise that the torch would be carbon-free failed to materialise.

Remember When... -

TAGS: barack obama barry soetoro selma alabama mythmaking lies
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - March 14, 2015, 12:35 pm
The truth never stopped him from making a BS impassioned speech before, why start now?

White Privilege Is A Myth -

White Privilege Is A Myth -

EPA: Killing Manatees In The Name Of Global Warming -

Global Warming Is A Hoax -

Redistributing World's Wealth By Climate Policy -

Global Warming Truth -

Hussein's Hypocrisy -

you can't spell 'Liberal' without lie -

White Privilege -

Science Proves Global Warming Is A Myth -

The Truth About Climate Change & CO2 -

Climate Change Truth -